Which Bush Doctrine would that be, Charlie?

According to the man who first identified the Bush Doctrine, it appears that despite the impression you may have have drawn from ABC’s Charlie Gibson interview with Sarah Palin, apparently the Governor is more in touch with the definition of the term than Gibson is.  Moreover, her request that Gibson make his question about the Bush Doctrine more specific was entirely apt, in that the Bush Doctrine has gone through no fewer than four incarnations.

For those who didn’t see it, Gibson first refused to specify what he meant by the Bush Doctrine, then when Palin began to answer, Gibson “corrected” her and identified the Bush Doctrine as an asserted right to pre-emptive military self-defense.  The above article skewers that definition as woefully outdated and insufficient.

UPDATE: Wow, I’m just dizzy.  Michelle Malkin cribbed my title.  And after only two or three days live.  (She could at least have thrown me a trackback.)

UPDATE II: Apologies to Ms. Malkin.  My stats have alerted me to a trackback listing on MichelleMalkin.com.  (I still came up with the title first, tho’. :::snicker!:::)

Advertisements

4 thoughts on “Which Bush Doctrine would that be, Charlie?

  1. Pingback: We’ll break you (though we never made you) « WitSnapper | The Blog

  2. Pingback: Palin Minefield: No casualties…yet « WitSnapper | The Blog

  3. Pingback: Palin Minefield: No casualties…yet « WitSnapper | The Blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s